Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "Peo. Ex Rel. Wenzel v. C. & N.W.R.R. Co." by Supreme Court of Illinois # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Peo. Ex Rel. Wenzel v. C. & N.W.R.R. Co.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Peo. Ex Rel. Wenzel v. C. & N.W.R.R. Co.
  • Author : Supreme Court of Illinois
  • Release Date : January 27, 1963
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 73 KB

Description

These appeals, consolidated for purposes of review, are prosecuted by defendant, the Chicago and North Western Railway Company, from orders of the county court of Macoupin County overruling defendant's objections to property taxes for the years 1956, 1957, 1958 and 1959. We have jurisdiction because the revenue is involved. The pleadings in each case consisted of the application of the county collector for judgment for the taxes paid by defendant under protest in each particular year, and the objections of defendant to allegedly excessive taxes levied against its property. With respect to each year the objections alleged that defendant's property in Macoupin County had been assessed at its full, fair cash value by the Department of Revenue, (a fact here conceded by the plaintiff-collector to be true,) but that locally assessed property, even after giving effect to the multiplier or equalization factor certified by the Department for each year, had been assessed at no more than 42.70% of full, fair cash value for the years 1956, 1957 and 1958, and at no more than 55% for the year 1959. Continuing, the objections alleged that the under-assessment of the locally assessed property was deliberate on the part of the State and local officials concerned, that it was constructively fraudulent, and that the undervaluation of locally assessed property resulted in excessive, illegal and discriminatory taxes on defendant's property, the recovery of which was prayed. We note in passing that the issues raised by these objections were the same as those first considered by this court in People ex rel. Hillison v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. 22 Ill.2d 88, and People ex rel. Kohorst v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Co., 22 Ill.2d 104, and that the county court had the benefit of those decisions when it entered the orders from which appeal has been taken. Here, however, evidentiary problems are presented which did not arise in the Hillison and Kohorst cases.


Free PDF Books "Peo. Ex Rel. Wenzel v. C. & N.W.R.R. Co." Online ePub Kindle